[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
From: Carl Ellison <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 16:49:25 EST
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: [email protected]'s message of Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:24:01 PST <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

>Sender: [email protected]
>X-Signed: PGP-Detached-2-3,
>   iQBXAwUBLzhSutC3U5sdKpFdAQEEqwIMCg1PFWC19WuW2BhwmzUyg84RthT/61x9
>   vLrIPbgrYcCXCNB8F51tQogs5lBrry/aOk2Fk3Izl//XC4KDl+cADrCz
>Date: Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:24:01 PST
>From: [email protected]

>of the very most important rights.  To hold the owner of a buliten
>board responsible for the illegal messages posted to it, is to force
>the buliten board owner to become a government censor in all but name
>(and wages).

anyone heard of "no unfunded mandates" ?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  - From: slowdog <[email protected]>
- Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  - From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Judges-L FAQ
Next by Date: To clear this up.
Prev by thread: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
Next by thread: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread