[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers
On Mon, 6 Feb 1995, Wei Dai wrote:
> I think over the long run the last factor will be most important. In
> a DC-Net, for each bit one participant wants to send to another, EVERY
> OTHER participant must broadcast a bit to ALL participants. I can
> imagine a remailer-net with one million users, but I don't see any
> possibility that a DC-Net can be scaled to that size.
Not so -- you merely have to broadcast to enough people.
But then the topology, and hence the complexity, gets worse.
This however merely reduces the bandwidth waste from n^2 to n*lg(n)
A further wrinkle -- forming DC nets of DC nets, can reduce the
bandwidth waste to lg(n)^2, which should scale adequately to cover
the cosmos, but then the complexity gets really scary.
And when you try to figure how to deal with denial of service
attacks in a big DC net that tries to use bandwidth with
tolerable efficiency -- I don't know if anyone has figured out
what would be involved -- I certainly have not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.catalog.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the omnipotent state. | [email protected]