[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: why pgp sucks
Derek Atkins says:
> The point is to have a centralized, distributed key distribution
> mechanism, similar in concept to the PGP Public Keyservers, but which
> scale much much better. The concept is similar to a DNS of PGP keys
> (think of the DNS model, not the DNS implementation) where you have
> keys distributed based upon site. For example, MIT could server MIT's
> keys, and CMU would server CMU's keys.
>
> This does not go against PGP in any way. In fact, it augments PGP
> wonderfully. How else would we be able to have a world-wide white
> pages of PGP Public Keys?
Unfortunately, the current PGP practice of using only numeric key-ids
in message packets makes it hard to do this -- sigh. I hope that
the next version of PGP changes this.
Perry