[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: a hole in PGP

To: [email protected] (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: a hole in PGP
From: [email protected] (Futplex)
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 22:01:01 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Dr. Frederick B. Cohen" at Aug 1, 95 08:12:11 am
Reply-To: [email protected] (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Sender: [email protected]

Dr. Frederick B. Cohen writes:
> It's probably my fault for not asking them in the way you are used to
> hearing them, or maybe we are all over-sensitive about our work.

Since I've had no involvement in the writing of PGP and RFC 1750, I don't 
think I'm being sensitive about my work :]

[...]
> And if enough of those on this list feel that this discussion and my postings
> are too commercial or too abusive to take, I am certain that Brent will send
> you a free copy of his Fred filter.

Nah, we're not into third-party censorship here. As for myself, I intend to
keep reading what you write here. Your manner is not a legitimate reason to 
ignore the value of (some of) your words. 

-Futplex <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: a hole in PGP
  - From: [email protected] (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)

Prev by Date: NRC Panel, Law Enforcement questions
Next by Date: Re: Pat Robertson Fears E-cash?
Prev by thread: Re: a hole in PGP
Next by thread: Re: a hole in PGP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread