Re: ecash remailer

[rajaram@morgan.com (P. Rajaram)]

On Nov 2,  7:23am, Hal wrote:
> Subject: Re: ecash remailer
> It's very frustrating to have to speculate so much due to the lack of
> information.  Imagine how we would react if Cybercash or Netscape had
> gone forward with what they claimed were secure protocols but had
> refused to publish them, referring simply to old papers on RSA and
> DES.  Yet Digicash gets away with this.

So, refuse to buy their money.
Demand open systems.

If you feel like being more terroristic, get Markoff to write an article
on how a cypherpunk expert feels that the Mark Twain Bankshares system
'may' be insecure.

-r