[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Flaw in Netscape rejoinder (was Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit Cards)

To: Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Flaw in Netscape rejoinder (was Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit Cards)
From: Tony Iannotti <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 19:14:23 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Pete Loshin <[email protected]>, Jeff Weinstein <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Wed, 31 Jan 1996, Nathaniel Borenstein wrote:

> choice of FV vs encryption is an either/or thing.  Combine FV's Virtual
> PIN mechanism with transport encryption and you've indiputably got
> something that's a LOT safer than just using credit cards with
> encryption, and a bit safer than our current system, too.  But I know,

Belt & Suspenders is Good (and you want the best and best tested of both.)
I may be being naive, but I think the contest profits all, so as brothers 
fight ye! ;-)

References:
- Flaw in Netscape rejoinder (was Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit Cards)
  - From: Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Flaw in FV process (was FV and Netscape slagging each other off :-)
Next by Date: re: More FUD
Prev by thread: Flaw in Netscape rejoinder (was Re: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit Cards)
Next by thread: RE: No FV supporters?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread