[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OS/2 encryption
On Sat, 20 Apr 1996 [email protected] wrote:
> I have received a lot of comment about my request for OS/2
> encryption...perhaps I didn't make myself clear.
[...]
> *That's* why I inquired about disk security. Not because I'm trying to
> hide something from Scientology...but because I don't appreciate people
> messing around with something that I've worked very hard on.
Not to get too out of hand, but how is encryption going to prevent deletions?
> Deana M. Holmes
> [email protected]
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.1
> GAT d- s++ a C++ U P L E- W++ N++ o-- K++ w--- O++ PS++ PE-- Y+ PGP+ t 5
> X-- R- tv-- b++ DI++ D++ G e++++ h+ r* x++
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>
>
---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:[email protected]
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: [email protected]