[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Off-Topic] "Curfews"
On 6 Jun 96 at 17:55, jim bell wrote:
> At 02:47 PM 6/6/96 +0000, Jean-Francois Avon wrote:
> >On 6 Jun 96 at 11:19, jim bell wrote:
> >
> >
> >> >>I _do_ believe, however, that the number of people
> >> >>unjustifiably targeted will be rather low. <snip> Retaliation
> >> >>is possible, in
> >> >> that case.
> >
> >Sorry Jim, I did not get that at all in the past. I assumed a
> >context where the inner workings of AP would not be well understood
> > by the population while here, you seems to indicate that everybody
> > would operate under the threat / deterrance of mutual anihilation
> >principle.
>
> Hmmm... sorry, I thought that was obvious. Well, perhaps not
> "obvious," but it's one of those facts that will become second
> nature to people once AP starts up.
Well, yes and no. What made me change my mind is when I tried to see
the situation from the standpoint of a guy from a thuggish mentality.
Actually, it might not deter somebody else acting on the spur of the
moment. Take a typical harsh divorce situation where peoples act in
the most surprisingly irrationnal way. I think that ex-husbands or
wifes would get targeted more than their fair share, and quite often,
without any reasonable cause.
JF
DePompadour, Societe d'Importation Ltee; Limoges porcelain, silverware and crystal
JFA Technologies, R&D consultants: physicists, technologists and engineers.
PGP keys at: http://w3.citenet.net/users/jf_avon
ID# C58ADD0D : 529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891