[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Off-Topic] "Curfews"
On 6 Jun 96 at 11:19, jim bell wrote:
> >>I _do_ believe, however, that the number of people unjustifiably
> >>targeted will be rather low. <snip> Retaliation is possible, in
> >> that case.
Sorry Jim, I did not get that at all in the past. I assumed a
context where the inner workings of AP would not be well understood
by the population while here, you seems to indicate that everybody
would operate under the threat / deterrance of mutual anihilation
principle.
A argued that an impulsive guy might target somebody unjustifiably
while I overlooked that he could think twice before doing so. But by
his nature, being a violent or thug at heart, he will understand this
"peace based on threat" maybe even better than a pacifist at heart.
So, my arguments might not stand.
Have any constructive comments? (hey, just play devil's advocate from
time to time :)
Ciao
JFA
DePompadour, Societe d'Importation Ltee; Limoges porcelain, silverware and crystal
JFA Technologies, R&D consultants: physicists, technologists and engineers.
PGP keys at: http://w3.citenet.net/users/jf_avon
ID# C58ADD0D : 529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891