[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Netescrow & Remailers?

To: Matts Kallioniemi <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: Netescrow & Remailers?
From: Robert Hettinga <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 13:18:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3.0b36.32.19961024162651.0093fab0@localhost>
Sender: [email protected]

At 10:28 am -0400 10/24/96, Matts Kallioniemi wrote:
> This way there would never be any abuse complaints on IN remailers because
> they are invisible. When an OUT remailer is taken out nobody gets hurt
> because OUT remailers will never be used in reply blocks.

Right. And, of couse, the OUT remailers charge *money*, payable to "whom it
may concern"... :-).

Cheers,
Bob

-----------------
Robert Hettinga ([email protected])
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"The cost of anything is the foregone alternative" -- Walter Johnson
The e$ Home Page: http://www.vmeng.com/rah/

References:
- Re: Netescrow & Remailers?
  - From: Matts Kallioniemi <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: In-Line Skating Safety and Courtesy
Next by Date: to whoever runs the "best of security list"
Prev by thread: Re: Netescrow & Remailers?
Next by thread: Re: Netescrow & Remailers?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread