Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list

[ichudov@algebra.com]

Dale Thorn wrote:
> 1. The subscribers have spoken by staying put, or,
> 2. The subscribers are so lazy and unaware of what's going on that
>    they've just left things as is.

> Now, in my opinion, we've come to this:  Some people here will hold
> the optimistic view of the bulk of the subscribers, and others will
> hold the pessimistic view (the bulk will presumably be in-between).

In case of 2, they are probably not worthy of your help.

	- Igor.