[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list
[email protected] writes:
> Dale Thorn wrote:
> > 1. The subscribers have spoken by staying put, or,
> > 2. The subscribers are so lazy and unaware of what's going on that
> > they've just left things as is.
>
> > Now, in my opinion, we've come to this: Some people here will hold
> > the optimistic view of the bulk of the subscribers, and others will
> > hold the pessimistic view (the bulk will presumably be in-between).
>
> In case of 2, they are probably not worthy of your help.
I wholeheartedly agree. By now everyone's painfully aware that there
are 3 mailing lists. It's not my responsibily (or Dale's) to encourage
cypherpunks subscribers to do what I think is best for them - resubscribe
to cypherpunks-unedited. Folks who choose to let Sandy choose what they
read and don't read should be free to do that.
---
<a href="mailto:[email protected]">Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM</a>
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps