[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: another idea?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: another idea?
From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 17:25:29 +0000
Comments: Authenticated sender is <[email protected]>
Priority: normal
Sender: [email protected]


> > How about, we have
> > cypherpunks-raw: unmoderated 110% SPAM
> > cypherpunks: moderated by Sandy and other moderator.
> 
> That was the original proposal.
> Now that the 'discussion' has come around full circle, can we
> stop talking about it and DO it?

Am I to presume that we will be putting something in the "welcome to 
cypherpunks" message people get when they join to tell them how to 
subscribe to the uncensored list? - or are we going to have  
yet more censorship on this list which is rapidly degenerating 
into a playground of illuminati and elite censors???



  Datacomms Technologies web authoring and data security
       Paul Bradley, [email protected]
  [email protected], [email protected]    
       Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
      Email for PGP public key, ID: 5BBFAEB1
     "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"

Follow-Ups:
- Re: another idea?
  - From: "Mark M." <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Reminder: Physical DC Cypherpunks Meeting
Next by Date: "Secret Power" by Nicky Hager
Prev by thread: Re: Reminder: Physical DC Cypherpunks Meeting
Next by thread: Re: another idea?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread