[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: another idea?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 14 Jan 1997 [email protected] wrote:
> Am I to presume that we will be putting something in the "welcome to
> cypherpunks" message people get when they join to tell them how to
> subscribe to the uncensored list?
- From the "welcome message":
I. Administrivia (please read, boring though it may be)
The cypherpunks list is one of three lists discussing
cryptography, privacy, and social issues relating to them. The three
lists are:
cypherpunks moderated to suppress spam and flames
cypherpunks-unedited all submissions, just as they arrived
cypherpunks-flames the submissions that didn't pass moderation
All of these lists are high-volume mailing lists.
> or are we going to have
> yet more censorship on this list which is rapidly degenerating
> into a playground of illuminati and elite censors???
This list is rapidly degenerating into something, but it's not "a playground of
illuminati and elite censors".
Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBMtw32CzIPc7jvyFpAQFU0wf9H77cGP3nfVfogGqy3r+PHxOVVmpivLbK
0d8b/5ay7H6KGpvivXdV+YwqVLu75hLm59H7zPZBb0387R8T/cISg3AznP5F1upP
IJDA36ebKWIIHOcLMOkwAIkQq8yI/xWCtvp4DInoC2VL4HbzFcjQbLaO6+up3KDK
mNLslx6vWFtNGzGbxvOrMvyfm/2UJseYLnvkm0YOWmpdLqJiakEh1FED2UbWhHig
KpJq1XLyjaT7ahEscN2oo6iWglOWikXRatFHGipqCgpNLqjA8uSaHifvO/dtAP09
Xy1z+hax0lnEiid0izqaCFpcr1jhEB89Ylk/iYgBAeZB+3UzvZVXow==
=kJwv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----