[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys"

To: [email protected] (Tim May)
Subject: Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys"
From: Patrick Oonk <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 19:35:31 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <v03102800b020ce21f94c@[207.167.93.63]> from "Tim May" at Aug 20, 97 09:49:15 am
Sender: [email protected]


> First off, I don't believe _anyone_ should ever have a "court-appointed
> attorney." We don't believe people should get state-subsidized food, or
> shelter, or medical care, and so on....or at least most of us don't. So why
> the big exception for hiring attorneys?

Maybe for the simple reason that some people might not have the money to
defend themselves ?

-- 
| Patrick Oonk -    http://patrick.mypage.org/  - [email protected] |
| PGP Key ID 0xDA2E93FA   -   Internic PO59   -   <clicketyclick> |
| Pine Internet B.V.           Consultancy, installatie en beheer |
| Tel: +31-70-3111010 - Fax: +31-70-3111011 - http://www.pine.nl/ |

Follow-Ups:
- Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys"
  - From: Tim May <[email protected]>

References:
- An end to "court appointed attorneys"
  - From: Tim May <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: An end to "court appointed attorneys"
Next by Date: Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys"
Prev by thread: An end to "court appointed attorneys"
Next by thread: Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread