[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lack of evolutionary pressures
On Sat, Aug 23, 1997 at 08:47:03AM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
> Forwarded message:
>
> > Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 22:42:34 -0700
> > From: Kent Crispin <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: lack of evolutionary pressures (was Re: An end to "court appointed attorneys")
>
> > The evolutionary definition of "competent" is "propagate your genetic
> > material". A rough corollary is that those who raise the most children
> > to child-bearing age are the most competent.
>
> With all due respect, bullshit. Fecundity is in no way related to long-term
> survival as detailed in the various theories of Neo-Darwinian evolution or
> in actual studies.
Note that I didn't say "fecundity". And note also that I said "rough
corollary". Furthermore, it is simply false to state that "fecundity
is in no way related etc etc". A dominant gene that causes a fecundity of
zero, for example, will not propagate.
[...]
> Also note that Mayr has a new book out (about a year old I believe) that
> covers some of the most recent changes of the punctuated-equilibria and
> neo-darminian camps.
Thanks -- I will look into it. I know of Dr Mayr's work from other
sources, but I didn't know he had a new book out.
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
[email protected] the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html