[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Speech as co-conspiring? I don't think so.

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Speech as co-conspiring? I don't think so.
From: TruthMonger <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 1997 18:39:05 -0600
CC: [email protected]
Organization: "It's not FUD until *I* say it's FUD!"
References: <439400e9f3604a48781f48485a000403@squirrel>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


> Monty Cantspell, Iditor in Grief of Groan Ragazine, writed:

> When Attila says "I have this message from the list" and it has a
> valid signature, it makes things considerably more interesting because
> we don't have to trust Attila very much.

Attila,
  If you are short on reputation capital, I could lend you some.

TruthMonger

References:
- re: Speech as co-conspiring? I don't think so.
  - From: Secret Squirrel <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Copyright commerce and the street musician protocol
Next by Date: Change in Bernstein oral argument time
Prev by thread: re: Speech as co-conspiring? I don't think so.
Next by thread: re: Speech as co-conspiring? I don't think so.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread