Re: A Legal Strategy

[ulf@fitug.de (Ulf M�ller)]

Monty Cantsin writes:

>Now, you are in an interesting situation.  You can't give the
>passwords for half of the disks, but you are unable to prove this.
>This means you have nothing to gain by giving the pass phrase to the
>"Ulysses" disk - you will always be seen as holding out.  Even if you
>convince the Judge that some of the disks are noise, you have no
>reason not to include the "Ulysses" disk in this set.

Bryan Olson once discussed something like this in a sci.crypt post:
<URL:http://www.sevenlocks.com/papers/crypto/duress.txt>