[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users

To: [email protected] (Ulf M�ller )
Subject: Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users
From: "Robert A. Costner" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 1997 20:22:27 -0500
Cc: [email protected] (Ian Grigg), [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 12:23 AM 11/9/97 +0100, Ulf M�ller wrote:
>> > 20 % of the users who have posted digitally signed messages that are
>> >  available in my news spool (international and local newsgroups and
>> >  mailing lists) use PGP 5.  The sample contains 545 unique e-mail
>> >  addresses.  YMMV.

Just to skew the numbers, I for instance have PGP 5.0 but am using a 2.6.2 
DOS generated key that is RSA, not DSS.  Grepping would show me to be PGP5.x, 
which perhaps technically I am, but my key is really 2.x


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQBVAwUBNGUQUEGpGhRXg5NZAQF7fQH5AfV2VfTwuLYs1ND6UTwoWIzAf3OjTSA8
saBlUQJquCUotwr5zk3cU+KiJJ9/hgLsLzOfet16ow1Do3zop7zUJw==
=VDPv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  -- Robert Costner                  Phone: (770) 512-8746
     Electronic Frontiers Georgia    mailto:[email protected]  
     http://www.efga.org/            run PGP 5.0 for my public key

References:
- Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users
  - From: [email protected] (Ulf M�ller)

Prev by Date: Sloppy Chips from Intel
Next by Date: Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users
Prev by thread: Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users
Next by thread: Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread