[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users

To: [email protected] (Ian Grigg)
Subject: Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users
From: [email protected] (Ulf M�ller)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 00:23:22 +0100 (GMT+0100)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Ian Grigg" at Nov 8, 97 04:21:00 am
Sender: [email protected]


> > 20 % of the users who have posted digitally signed messages that are
> >  available in my news spool (international and local newsgroups and
> >  mailing lists) use PGP 5.  The sample contains 545 unique e-mail
> >  addresses.  YMMV.
> 
> These are very interesting results.  One question: what are the groups
> about?  Are they close in to PGP topics or far away?

A number of them are crypto related, including the OpenPGP and a
German PGP users' mailing list.  Perhaps someone with access to a
large newsserver could grep for PGP signatures on the rec.* hierarchy?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users
  - From: "Robert A. Costner" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Content controls
Next by Date: Re: Mixed Messages / Re: F00FC7C8 Kills P5 AND Re: Major securityflaw in Cybercash 2.1.2 (fwd)
Prev by thread: Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users
Next by thread: Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread