[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Big Brother Sees through walls (from the spyking list)
> From: sunder <[email protected]>
>
> 1)From: "George Martin" <[email protected]>
> Subject: News Release: High-Tech Surveillance
>
> Here's a sampling of how state and federal agencies are using this
> terrifying technology to spy on Americans:
>
> * In North Carolina, county governments use high-resolution spy satellite
> photographs to search for property improvements that might increase
> property tax assessments.
Was this cost authorized by taxpayers?
> * On the Mexican border, police use a "gamma ray scanner" to check
> tanker trucks for contraband, scanning right through the vehicle's metal
> sides.
Good!!!
CM excerpt:
# Those rumor-level stories about our government encouraging
# drugs to reach the inner cities were weird.
#
# Remember, we've been having a Drug War for four decades now.
#
# I guess there is a certain logic to it. Obviously the government is into
# hysteria on the matter: it is then possible that they would want to continue
# having a drug problem so they could continue the hysteria.
#
# Even the Attorney General was drooling over drug forfeiture dollars, to the
# point of shunting aside other cases.
#
#
# Recently...
#
# : CBS 60 Minutes, Steve Croft reporting.
# :
# : Remember that story of the hero customs agent snagging a tanker truck full
# : of cocaine? There is a strange twist to the story.
# :
# : The Federal agent's manager repeatedly tried to interfere with him making
# : the bust.
# :
# : The agent's dog had flagged the truck; the agent weighed it and found a
# : discrepancy. His manager said it must be in the tires. You can only check
# : the tires for drugs he was told.
# :
# : But the agent persisted, and made the bust. His manager let the driver
# : of the truck leave. The driver literally fled on foot back to Mexico.
#
# What the hell was that about???
#
# Was it a single corrupt Federal agent?
#
# : CBS 60 Minutes, Steve Croft reporting.
# :
# : Standing at a fence about a hundred feet from the U.S. Customs lanes,
# : Steve Croft and an ex-agent with a walkie-talkie tuned to the right
# : frequency began videotaping the border crossings.
# :
# : Truck after truck drove right through the individual Customs lanes,
# : not even stopping. "Nafta express lanes" explained the ex-agent.
# :
# : Truck after truck drove straight into the U.S. unmonitored.
# :
# : Then a message came through the walkie-talkie: "We got some cameras
# : watching, better get out there and cover traffic".
# :
# : Suddenly several Customs agents came out of the booths and started
# : inspecting trucks.
#
# That makes at least five people at a minimum!
#
# What the hell is going on???
#
#
# IF the rumor is true, THIS looks like it would be the smoking gun.
#
# How did our country get so twisted around that they can invade our
# bodies to drug test, yet allow truck after truck after truck to
# just wander right in knowing HUGE drug shipment after HUGE drug
# shipment is crossing? Gosh, there's no drug problem with Mexican
# police, military and even their president.
#
# * The New York Times, February 19 1997
# *
# * Brig. General Jesus Gutierrez Rebollo, Mexico's top Military Drug War
# * point man, was arrested on charges of receiving payoffs from Jaurez
# * cartel kingpin Amado Carrillo Fuentes, Defense Minister Enrique Cervantes
# * announced.
# *
# * U.S. Drug Czar Gen. Barry McCaffrey had weeks earlier called General
# * Gutierrez "a guy of absolute unquestioned integrity."
#
#
# And what if some terrorists wanted to sneak in an atom bomb?
#
# Put a NAFTA sticker on it and drive right on in, y'all. Welcome to the USA.
#
# If you want to really be certain, hide the A-bomb in a truck full of cocaine.
#
# If a terrorist nuclear bomb ever goes off in this country,
# it drove in from Mexico.
#
# Meanwhile, Los Alamos National Laboratories developed technology that
# allows an officer walking or driving down the street, as shown on MSNBC TV
# 6/9/97 www.TheSite.com, to determine whether anyone on the sidewalk is
# carrying a gun.
#
# The priorities are all out of whack.
#
# Apply Military technology towards securing the border, not by spending
# billions and billions and billions each year to secure each and every
# one of us.
#
# We don't put governing-monitors on all car engines to control speeding.
# Get an Operations Research clue.
#
#
# Is our government perpetuating the availability of drugs?
#
# The 60 Minutes report sure makes it look like it is.
#
# How could letting unchecked Mexican truck after unchecked Mexican truck
# through not be?
#
# ! FBI Director Louis J. Freeh, Senate Judiciary Committee, June 4, 1997
# !
# ! NEW CORRIDORS HAVE OPENED TO CONTINUE THE FLOOD OF DRUGS INTO AMERICA.
#
# No shit, Sherlock! Ya don't nafta say another word.
#
# Every single truck can be checked using Military technology.
#
# But no, massive monitoring of people suspected of no crime is the
# appropriate response.
#
# They were just warming us up for the CALEA telephone monitoring bill.
#
# ----
#
# Here is part of the story on why we let trucks full of cocaine and
# heroin just roll right into the United States.
#
# * "Diminished U.S. Role Below Border Plays Into Traffickers' Hands"
# *
# * By Molly Moore and John Ward Anderson
# * Washington Post Foreign Service
# * Sunday, September 8 1996; Page A01
# * The Washington Post
# *
# * Due to their new 'Mexicanization policy':
# * Mexico became the main gateway into the United States for illegal
# * narcotics, with the amount of cocaine making the journey climbing to
# * an estimated 210 tons last year.
# *
# * Mexico's drug arrests plunged nearly 65 percent, from 27,369 the year
# * before the policy changes to 9,728 last year, according to data that
# * the Mexican government supplied to the State Department.
# *
# * Cocaine seizures in Mexico were cut in half, dropping from more than
# * 50 tons in 1993 to slightly more than 24 tons in each of the last two
# * years -- the smallest amounts since 1988, Mexican government figures
# * show.
# *
# * The GAO report charges that Mexico's greatest problem is, in
# * fact, the "widespread, endemic corruption" throughout its law
# * enforcement agencies. Earlier this month, in an indictment of his own
# * department, Attorney General Lozano fired 737 members of his federal
# * police force -- 17 percent of his entire corps -- saying they did not
# * have "the ethical profile" required for the job. In a recent meeting
# * with foreign reporters, Lozano said it could take 15 years to clean up
# * the force.
# *
# * In November 1993, President Clinton signed Presidential Decision Directive
# * No. 14, shifting U.S. anti-drug efforts away from intercepting cocaine as
# * it passed through Mexico and the Caribbean, and, instead, attacking the
# * drug supply at its sources in Colombia, Bolivia and Peru.
#
# The President himself ordered them to stop checking!!! This is in the same
# leadership vein as Reagan declaring himself a "Contra".
#
# And why did President Clinton change strategy?
[snip]
> * The Naval Surface Warfare Center has developed an "ion sniffer,"
> a metal box that analyzes the chemical makeup of the air -- and can detect,
> for example, traces of cocaine through the skin days after drug use.
Bad.
> * In Georgia, the state's Department of Revenue will start using
> NASA satellites to examine the state's 58,910 square miles for illegal
> timber cutting.
Good.
> * In New Jersey, California, and other states, police use thermal
> imaging devices to scan houses for unusual heat sources that could indicate
> indoor marijuana growing operations. Houses can be scanned while police sit
> in their cruisers on the street.
Bad.
CM excerpt:
# Here is a more detailed example of how government expands surveillance
# (and thus control) in a seemingly never-ending manner...consider this when
# talking about a National ID Card:
#
# Is it okay for the government to look at your property while walking by and
# if the officer spots marijuana plants growing to get a search warrant?
#
# Of course it is.
#
# * "The Right To Privacy", ISBN 0-679-74434-7, 1997
# * By Attorneys Ellen Alderman and Caroline Kennedy
# *
# * ...then the Supreme Court ruled that if the yard was big enough that "An
# * individual may not legitimately demand privacy for activities conducted
# * out of doors in fields," the Court wrote, "except in the area immediately
# * surrounding the home."
# *
# * ...then the Supreme Court ruled that a barn sixty yards from a farmhouse
# * was too far away from a house to expect privacy.
# *
# * ...then the Supreme Court ruled that aerial surveillance did not constitute
# * a Fourth Amendment search.
# *
# * ...then the Supreme Court ruled that a "precision aerial mapping camera"
# * that was able to capture objects as small as one-half inch in diameter did
# * not constitute a Fourth Amendment search.
#
# ...then courts ruled that infrared surveillance of homes was permissible.
#
#
# What is this?
#
# * Subject: Re: Law Enforcement Aviation
# * From: [email protected]
# * Date: 1996/12/27
# * Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military
# *
# * What interests me is how new technologies will be interpreted. I recently
# * inquired at the local Law School about the courts views towards the use
# * of impulse radar, and they said "Impulse what the heck?"
# *
# * Basically it is a radar that "sees through" things (like, say, your
# * house).
# *
# * Their capabilities vary widely, but the feds are already using
# * them and I know that Hughes corp. is designing a low-cost set up
# * specifically for major police departments.
# *
# * They are driving towards a unit that can be mounted on a police helicopter.
# *
# * Will the police need a warrant? Who knows. Since they are allowed
# * to do airborne infra-red analysis of your house, why not an take an
# * airborne "x-ray" equivalent?
# *
# * ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# * Steven J Forsberg at [email protected] Wizard 87-01
> * And in Arizona, the state's Department of Water Resources uses
> spy satellite photographs to monitor 750,000 acres of state farmland, and
> compares the images to a database to discover which farmers don't have
> irrigation permits.
Good, I guess.
> Even worse: The federal government will spend another $4.5 million
> this year to develop even more intrusive surveillance equipment.
Bad.
> Currently under development by the Justice Department: A "super
> x-ray" -- combining traditional x-ray technology, ultra-sound imaging,
> and computer-aided metal detectors -- to reveal items hidden under clothes
> from up to 60 feet away.
Bad.
> The courts are currently wrestling with the implications of the new
> technology, debating the limits of the government's power to "search"
> individuals from a distance with high-tech gadgets. Several contradictory
> court decisions have already emerged, for example, about whether
> thermal-imaging searches are Constitutional.
>
> Meanwhile, Republican and Democratic politicians continue to look
> for new uses of the technology -- with some government officials already
> talking about using satellite surveillance to track items as small as
> backyard porches to check for zoning violations and construction permits.
Smart cards are transponders.
Never forget that.
> "In the name of fighting crime, politicians seem eager to obliterate the
> protections against unreasonable search, with equipment that Americans used
> to only read about in Tom Clancy technothrillers," said Dasbach. "It's time
> for the American public to wake up and realize that Big Brother is here
> today -- and he's got a gamma ray scanner in his hand."
No amount of control over the population is enough for the U.S. Government.
---guy