[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: atheism (was: RE: Democracy... (fwd)) (fwd)
Forwarded message:
> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 22:34:19 -0700
> From: "Fred C. Moulton" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: atheism (was: RE: Democracy... (fwd)) (fwd)
> Within the past year I attended a lecture by Mr. Smith and during the
> lecture he indicated that his formulation was being preferred by
> scholars in the field while the one given by Jim Choate was still
> used in the popular culture.
>
> Thus I think it is inappropriate to criticize the definition of
> atheism used by [email protected].
Well Fred you and pjm can believe what you wish, I fully support it.
However, yourself, pjm, & Mr. Smith are claiming that a belief that
something doesn't exist isn't a belief is simply a tricky play on semantics.
A belief in a negative is still a belief irrespective of how many people
believe it. Might doesn't make right (or logical).
As I've demonstrated before (and for the last time):
^(A) = (^A)
Argue all you want,
Yet it moves.
____________________________________________________________________
The seeker is a finder.
Ancient Persian Proverb
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [email protected]
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------