RE: atheism (was: RE: Democracy... (fwd)) (fwd)

[Matthew James Gering <mgering@ecosystems.net>]

Jim Choate wrote:
> As I've demonstrated before (and for the last time):
> 
> ^(A) = (^A)

f() = belief function
A = hypothesis
^ = not

f(^A) != ^f(A)

At least not without placing requirements on f().

Then you claim everything is a belief, so f() is meaningless. But then
you deny A == A when you claimed that metaphysical objectivity is a
belief, so what was the point in writing the equation in the first
place?

Go transcend.

	Matt