[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code)
From: Richard Stallman <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 1998 15:24:04 -0600
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (message from Ben Laurie onThu, 01 Oct 1998 10:26:39 +0100)
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


    d) As far as I can work out, someone who wants to free part of a
    product, but not all of it, can't practically do so under GPL.

I'm not really sure what that means, but I have a feeling that there
is a misunderstanding at the root of it.  Could you describe the scenario
more clearly, so I could tell for certain?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code)
  - From: Alex Alten <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code)
  - From: Ben Laurie <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: No Subject
Next by Date: Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code)
Prev by thread: Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code)
Next by thread: Re: propose: `cypherpunks license' (Re: Wanted: Twofish source code)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread