[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Goldbach's Conjecture (fwd)
>From _Elementary Theory of Numbers_ by William J. LeVeque, pg. 6:
"It was conjectured by Charles Goldbach in 1742 that every even integer
larger than 4 is the sum of two odd primes. (All primes except 2 are odd,
of course, since evenness means divisibility by two.)"
>From _Excursions in Number Theory_ by C. Stanley Ogilvy and John T.
Anderson, pg. 82:
"Goldbach's conjecture. Is every even number expressible as the sum of two
primes?"
>From _Goldbach's Conjecture_ by Eric W. Weisstein
(http://www.astro.virginia.edu/~eww6n/math/GoldbachConjecture.html):
"Goldbach's original conjecture, written in a 1742 letter to Euler, states
that every Integer >5 is the Sum of three Primes. As re-expressed by Euler,
an equivalent of this Conjecture (called the ``strong'' Goldbach conjecture)
asserts that all Positive Even Integers >= 4 can be expressed as the Sum of
two Primes."
Am I misreading somewhere?
Blake Buzzini, PSU
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Jim Choate
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 1998 10:39 PM
To: Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer
Subject: RE: Goldbach's Conjecture (fwd)
Forwarded message:
> From: "Blake Buzzini" <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Goldbach's Conjecture
> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 22:17:54 -0500
> I could be wrong, but I thought Goldbach's conjecture was that every even
> number could be expressed as the sum of *two* primes. This doesn't
prohibit
No, that was Fermat, Goldbach just says every even number greater than two
can be represented as a sum of primes. Basicaly Fermat says that if we have
n primes we can reduce them to 2 primes only, in all cases. Which happens to
exclude using equilateral triangles as a test bed since you can't tile a
equilateral with only two other equilaterals, you could use rectangles
though.
So basicaly from a geometric perspective Fermat says that given a rectangle
of
even area it is possible to divide it with a bisector into two rectangles of
prime area.
It's interesting that Fermat doesn't mention that the only prime that can
use two as a factor is 4. And you can't factor 2 at all since we eliminate
1 as a potential candidate (another issue of symmetry breaking simply so we
don't have to write '....works for every prime but 1' on all our theorems).
> repetition. Therefore, under Goldbach's conjecture:
>
> 4 -> 2 + 2
> 6 -> 3 + 3 but NOT 2 + 2 + 2
> 8 -> 5 + 3 but NOT 2 + 2 + 2
The real issue for me is the interaction of primes (ie n * 1 = n) and the
identity theorem (ie n * 1 = n). They're opposite sides of the same coin.
It doesn't really matter now since it doesn't look like I'm going to get a
copy of EURISKO in this lifetime to play with.
____________________________________________________________________
Lawyers ask the wrong questions when they don't want
the right answers.
Scully (X-Files)
The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate
Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ [email protected]
www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087
-====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-
--------------------------------------------------------------------