[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A novel (?) return address idea
There seems to me to be a serious problem with the "novel return
address" idea. The information that ties together multiple anonymous
messages from the same person is out in the world, encrypted by a
single key in a conventional cipher.
If that single key is compromised, everyone's identity is exposed. (Or,
at least, the correlation among all messages sent by that individual,
even if their legal or email name is not revealed).
Furthermore, breaking the key will be possible by sending test-probes
and doing exhaustive search. E.g. if you add 128 bits of salt,
someone can send five or ten messages to themself through the
remailer, and accumulate ten encrypted addresses that are known to be
for the same sender. When decrypted, these keys will have maybe a 16-
or 32-bit "return address ID" and 128 bits of salt. The attacker can
then search the key space for keys that include large numbers of
identical bits when decrypting those ten keys. This search is easily
amenable to parallelization, fast hardware also exists to do it, and
it may be possible to find improved algorithms to use the knowledge of
identical plaintext bits to speed up the search process.
The idea also suffers from the dossier problem -- all the information
about return addresses will exist in a single place (at the remailer
site) where it's tempting for a government (or other adversary of
privacy) to try for it.
Keep thinking, folks! We aren't there yet...