[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

re: Re: Mr. Squirrel

To: [email protected]
Subject: re: Re: Mr. Squirrel
From: [email protected] (Tom Jennings)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 22:26:18 PDT



 U> The most pressing thing is not to integrate encryptions in 
 U> mail handlers, but at the level of ether.  Ether is an 
 U> enormous security hole.  I can walk up to anything running 

Who uses ethernet?!  :-)

I think it's safe to say our FidoNet doesn't have three feet of
thinwire in it. We're all dialup. Message-reader integrated security
is where it's at -- here.

You're totally right about it though... but it requires physical access.


 * Origin: World Power Systems / FidoNews / San Francisco CA (1:125/111)
--  
Tom Jennings - via FidoNet node 1:125/555
    UUCP: ...!uunet!hoptoad!kumr!fidogate!111!Tom.Jennings
INTERNET: [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mr. Squirrel
  - From: Eric Hollander <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: PGP implementation for FidoNet
Next by Date: re: Matching Text, Headders and Signatures with Crypto Hashes
Prev by thread: Re: Mr. Squirrel
Next by thread: Re: Mr. Squirrel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread