[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A minor experimental result
> If I wanted to be obnoxious, I could set myself up as a remailer,
>then screen all incoming messages to see whether they came from other
>known remailers. If not, then I can archive the message, have a look at
>it, and maybe compromise the original sender.
> Is this so?
Seems quite possible to me.. I think that's why it was suggested a while
back that as many remailers be set up as possible. That way, one could use
several in a row and virtually eliminate the problem.
> In this case, everyone wanting to use a remailer should in principle
>*own* a remailer, and you'd probably want your own to be the first
>remailer. Then, to avoid compromise of the recipient, maybe you'd want
>yours to be the last remailer. So why not use your own remailer
I don't think you'd have to worry much about compromising the recipient, if
you encrypt the message with with her public key (except possibly traffic
analysis, which I doubt poses a problem to very many people, and which can
be overcome anyways).
> To take this to an extreme, set up a remailer and then use this
>*all* the time for the mail you originate. Does this gain you anything?
Well, it would probably be ok if a lot of other people used your remailer..
but if you were the only one, I doubt it would be very effective.
Andrew Derry - [email protected] |
[email protected] - Simon Fraser University |
Standard disclaimers apply |