[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

"RSA sells out" hue and cry (fwd)



More from Big Jim at RSA, criticizing the idea that RSA should have
licensed "its" algorithms to NIST only on the condition that they not be
used for clipper/capstone/key escrow and similar schemes

********* Quoth Jim Bidzos, verily I saith unto thee: **************

From cypherpunks-request  Thu Jun 17 09:30:24 1993
Received: by toad.com id AA29434; Thu, 17 Jun 93 09:23:01 PDT
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from tivoli.com ([146.84.1.5]) by toad.com id AA29426; Thu, 17 Jun 93 09:22:52 PDT
Received: from vail.tivoli.com by tivoli.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA27085; Thu, 17 Jun 93 11:22:38 CDT
Received: by vail.tivoli.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA14350; Thu, 17 Jun 93 11:21:26 CDT
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 93 11:21:26 CDT
From: [email protected] (Mike McNally)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
To: Duncan Frissell <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Contempt of court
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>


Duncan Frissell writes:
 > I call it a network operating system designed to cope with local security
 > breaches.  I am not required by law to keep business records in any
 > particular jurisdiction.  I am not even required to have access to
 > everything in a business with which I am connected.

Of course you're likely to be right; my Highly Esteemed legal opinion
is worth about as much as the electrons transmitting it. 

 > But a charge of Sedition is such a rare honor ...
 >                                                  Besides, if the system is