[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list
From: "W. Kinney" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1993 11:32:40 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: [email protected]


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----



What's the point of resorting to contrived inducements to include signatures? 
If there's a real reason to do it, people will, and if not, they won't.

Perhaps we could just all by-and-large agree to sign posts? I'll start with 
this one...

                                 -- Will




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3

iQCVAgUBLMpmVvfv4TpIg2PxAQHrlAP5AaRssrPAO/sNsBkPVGKcJbn5z9exBlqd
JqG9nfx5HuinNFANovpGO5+zDp0fDtnQ4c1e86vsONQ3wSklXZx30IYG/h7cX4T9
rXNpxZVsT26lIHIrAxEXKBCRwhtlaO19+G1nN5DLChXF/DlnQiTRsmjxhPI1NI5r
9WyyI02GEDk=
=xy8S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: pirate radio
Next by Date: the principle of least astonishment
Prev by thread: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list
Next by thread: Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread