[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses
- To: supose a magic number were here <[email protected]>
- Subject: RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses
- From: [email protected]
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 20:47:52 PST
- Reply-To: "This is the place to put the very long magic numbers which represent a return address encrypted with the actual recipients public key which the recipient could decrypt and use as further remailing instructions this much text would only represent two hops so there may be buffer limits which multiple hop messages would overflow thus preventing the deli, very of the message but at least the there is a good chance your mail client will automatically include this information if you chose to reply" <[email protected]>
- Sender: [email protected]
- Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.
Go ahead, hit 'r' and see what you get. How many of you get the
whole verbose reply-to field?
j'