[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses
- To: "This is the place to put the very long magic numbers which represent a return address encrypted with the actual recipients public key which the recipient could decrypt and use as further remailing instructions this much text would only represent two hops so there may be buffer limits which multiple hop messages would overflow thus preventing the deli, very of the message but at least the there is a good chance your mail client will [email protected], [email protected], include this information if you chose to reply" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses
- From: "Jon 'Iain' Boone" <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 94 06:46:05 -0500
- Cc: supose a magic number were here <[email protected]>, [email protected]
- In-Reply-To: Message from [email protected] of "Tue, 15 Feb 94 20:47:52 PST." <[email protected]>
[email protected] writes:
>
> Go ahead, hit 'r' and see what you get. How many of you get the
> whole verbose reply-to field?
MH yields the Reply-To: field in its entirety.
Jon Boone | PSC Networking | [email protected] | (412) 268-6959 | PGP Key # B75699
PGP Public Key fingerprint = 23 59 EC 91 47 A6 E3 92 9E A8 96 6A D9 27 C9 6C