[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (forward message on privacy)
>
> Forwarded message:
> >From tomj Tue Mar 8 18:49:17 1994
> From: tomj (Tom Jennings)
> Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: (forward message on privacy) (fwd)
> To: [email protected] (Flesh)
> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 1994 18:49:15 -0800 (PST)
> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Flesh" at Mar 8, 94 06:21:38 pm
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Length: 897
>
> > Today I ran into a situation that made me completely nausiated and feel like
> > my privacy had been completely invaded... It involves a chip which is
> > implanted in animals and used for identification...
My first worry was whether it could be read at a distance, like
doorway radar scanners in the Mall. That would impose a privacy
problem on the human possibly accompanying the animal.
If not (apparantly that's the case now), then I don't have a problem
with it. Also, you could always remove it if needed.
sdw
--
Stephen D. Williams Local Internet Gateway Co.; SDW Systems 513 496-5223APager
LIG dev./sales Internet: [email protected] [email protected]
OO R&D Source Dist. By Horse: 2464 Rosina Dr., Miamisburg, OH 45342-6430
Comm. Consulting ICBM: 39 34N 85 15W I love it when a plan comes together