[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WSJ article on PGP

To: mg5n+anz3ajg8o1yxicqzt6v6qgpg3tkhddpqw3jl%[email protected]
Subject: Re: WSJ article on PGP
From: Anonymous <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 May 1994 17:02:41 -0400
Comments: This message was automatically remailed by an anonymous contact service. Direct replies to this message will be non-anonymously forwarded to the original sender. For anonymous replies, use the mg5n+an... format. For more information, send mail to [email protected] Please report problems to [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Phil Karn Wrote:

> Anybody know if the WSJ accepts letters to the editor by fax or email?
> I've drafted the following letter to the editor, but I couldn't find
> anything but a snail mail address in today's paper.
> 
> I *did* send a copy to Mr. Bulkeley's MCI mail address, so please
> do NOT forward it to him again...Phil

What's his MCImail address?  Perhaps some cypherpunks could share with
him their comments on the article, which have been posted to the list. 
(Don't tell him where you got the article tho!)

References:
- Re: WSJ article on PGP
  - From: "Jim Sewell" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: the value of money
Next by Date: Re: PC-Expo
Prev by thread: Re: WSJ article on PGP
Next by thread: Re: WSJ article on PGP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread