Re: possible anti-mandatory-clipper constitutional angle?

[Tommy the Tourist <nobody@soda.berkeley.edu>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

From: Ezekial Palmer <an60011@anon.penet.fi>
Date: Sat May 14 12:15:04 EDT 1994

    Date: Sat, 14 May 1994 11:40:47 -0400 (EDT)
    From: "R. David Murray" <rdmurray@keene.edu>
    Subject: possible anti-mandatory-clipper constitutional angle?

    A government mandante for key-escrow encryption in all
    communication devices would be the information-age equivalent of
    the government requiring private citizens to quarter troups in
    their home.

While I agree with you as to the analogy, a big part of me says "so
what?".  A major court decision or constitutional amendment that
effectively says that electronic info is equivalent to info on paper
would go a long way toward rationalizing the situation, but basically
there's almost no precedent at all for saying that any civil liberties
are protected in the electronic realm and there's a reasonable amount
of precedent in the other direction.

I suspect that you'd have a lot of trouble convincing the
technologically ignorant that something electronic could be at all
like quartering troops in your home.

A big problem in general is that "the information-age equivalent"
isn't something that most people can (or choose to) see.

			Zeke

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLdT5ORVg/9j67wWxAQHhEgP9ENyQ6zAVKst8NhpVxGd5CCBlmVWnNg4L
m9HI06Z5rOpbawvSMjkBdKXJGKu5ObKrNqrHP6N9s2ZhvDd2Q7gPdMbm9mXHpf7w
/uqsVE1a9bHob7F9FDVkz438a4bP8WaEHyZWOdpmvZ+bB7L1ELhuVWyT12vOy61h
vfTBj9B1sN4=
=VNuc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------
To respond to the sender of this message, send mail to
remailer@soda.berkeley.edu, starting your message with
the following 7 lines:
::
Response-Key: ideaclipper

====Encrypted-Sender-Begin====
MI@```$]S^P;+]AB?X9TW6\8WR:^P&2':U$*B?=.'X1J!JJA1M.D\ME8M'?MH
GS670];'$("C3!.=DH.!6L_>ISX4,5U)O?EU><HU9BY?VZ!&Q3XH=
====Encrypted-Sender-End====