Re: compatibility with future PGP

[Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>]

Perry writes:
| In any case, I don't understand why anyone would rationally oppose the
| distribution of Pr0duct Cypher's patches -- you don't have to use them
| if you don't like.

	I wasn't opposing them; I was suggesting that patching 2.5
would be more productive in the long run than patching 2.3

Adam


-- 
Adam Shostack 				       adam@bwh.harvard.edu

Politics.  From the greek "poly," meaning many, and ticks, a small,
annoying bloodsucker.