[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

    From: [email protected] (Matthew Gream)
    Subject: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
    Date: Wed, 25 May 94 12:43:46 EST
    
    Being Australian, I've not read the RSAREF conditions, but there is at
    the point that commercial use will still not be possible (at it would
    be under non-RSAREF 2.3a) when the RSA patent expires.

The GNU copyleft is supposed to disallow a lot of for-profit uses.

Zeke

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLeK/+xVg/9j67wWxAQGNqgP9FrqJ77ru0vH6mii7m9AElRfdqLvrFuum
7pRINtNpyW9qLtU8cQbdriAWJaxZX7CK70XkHPiSOXaIJ/A+pWrp4VW0f2F9vGBX
W3HkERqGT9ikOxDVHAq5Qk3IvvXss+Ms+QdzGSDRK1bAgzJLH/YYbsdpsXW4+fgi
raltpxGcZvg=
=i4MI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----