[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
- To: (Blind List Only)
- Subject: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
- From: Ezekial Palmer <an60011@anon.penet.fi>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 22:06:05 -0700
- Comments: This message was anonymously remailed. Do not reply to the address in the From: line, unless you wish to report a problem. Thank you.
- In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 May 1994 12:43:46 EST." <9405250243.AA03397@acacia.itd.uts.EDU.AU>
- Remailed-By: remail@extropia.wimsey.com
- Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
From: mgream@acacia.itd.uts.edu.au (Matthew Gream)
Subject: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Date: Wed, 25 May 94 12:43:46 EST
Being Australian, I've not read the RSAREF conditions, but there is at
the point that commercial use will still not be possible (at it would
be under non-RSAREF 2.3a) when the RSA patent expires.
The GNU copyleft is supposed to disallow a lot of for-profit uses.
Zeke
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLeK/+xVg/9j67wWxAQGNqgP9FrqJ77ru0vH6mii7m9AElRfdqLvrFuum
7pRINtNpyW9qLtU8cQbdriAWJaxZX7CK70XkHPiSOXaIJ/A+pWrp4VW0f2F9vGBX
W3HkERqGT9ikOxDVHAq5Qk3IvvXss+Ms+QdzGSDRK1bAgzJLH/YYbsdpsXW4+fgi
raltpxGcZvg=
=i4MI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----