[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 07:42:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 24 May 1994 22:06:05 PDT." <199405250506.AA01867@xtropia>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


Ezekial Palmer says:
> The GNU copyleft is supposed to disallow a lot of for-profit uses.

The GNU copyleft in no way prohibits any commercial use whatsoever.
Please do not spread inaccurate rumors about copyleft.

Perry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
  - From: [email protected]

References:
- Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
  - From: Ezekial Palmer <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: MIT has released PGP
Next by Date: Re: Graph isomorphism based PK cryptosystems?
Prev by thread: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Next by thread: Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread