[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Is the NSA really competent?
- To: cypherpunks@toad.com
- Subject: Is the NSA really competent?
- From: catalyst-remailer@netcom.com
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 1994 23:51:38 -0700
- Comment: This message is NOT from the address on the 'From:' line; it is from an anonymous remailing service. Please report problem mail to catalyst@netcom.com.
- Remailed-By: Remailer <catalyst-remailer@netcom.com>
- Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Here are the biggest breakthroughs in cryptography during the period
when the NSA has been the purported leader in the field, and
has enjoyed by far the largest budget:
public key: Diffie, Hellman, Merkle, R.,S., A., etc.
key escrow: Micali (and the current NSA/NIST scheme has all
the earmarks of being thrown on top of Skipjack at
the last moment, after Micali had published, and
perhaps even after Denning had discussed it).
DES: IBM
Skipjack: probably just a modified DES
IDEA: Swiss
Also zero-knowledge proofs, blind signatures, oblivious
transfer, BBS, and other recent advances were all discovered
outside the NSA.
For all their vaunted competence, for all the mathematicians
they have been alleged to employ, despite having a cryptography
budget orders of magnitude larger than any other Western
crypto group, it looks like the NSA contribued to _none_ of
the major advances in cryptography that occured during its zenith.