[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: broadcast encryption

To: [email protected] (Eric Hughes)
Subject: Re: broadcast encryption
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 1994 13:23:45 -0400
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 09 Aug 1994 09:49:29 PDT." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


Eric Hughes says:
>    > What is the policy purpose for signing packets?  It will affect the
>    > design.
> 
>    Anyone even making such suggestions has not been following the IPSP
>    standardization work...
> 
> I wasn't asking what _the_ purpose was, but rather what the purpose
> the original author (coming out of the context of a radio discussion)
> had in mind.  I know _lots_ of reasons for signing packets in some
> way.

Oh, I understood what you were saying -- I didn't understand what the
orignal author could be looking for...

.pm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: broadcast encryption
  - From: Dave Horsfall <[email protected]>

References:
- broadcast encryption
  - From: [email protected] (Eric Hughes)

Prev by Date: broadcast encryption
Next by Date: remailers
Prev by thread: broadcast encryption
Next by thread: Re: broadcast encryption
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread