Re: Are RSA licenses fungible?

["Rick H. Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>]

> From owner-cypherpunks@toad.com Sat Aug 27 22:08 PDT 1994
> Received: from relay2.UU.NET (relay2.UU.NET [192.48.96.7]) by ar.com (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id WAA01459 for <wessorh@ar.com>; Sat, 27 Aug 1994 22:08:22 -0700
> Received: from toad.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP 
> 	id QQxewa21172; Sun, 28 Aug 1994 01:07:36 -0400
> Received: by toad.com id AA01260; Sat, 27 Aug 94 21:59:17 PDT
> Received: from nic.cerf.net by toad.com id AA01254; Sat, 27 Aug 94 21:59:07 PDT
> Received: from ininx (ininx.com [134.24.4.70]) by nic.cerf.net (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id VAA26020; Sat, 27 Aug 1994 21:59:00 -0700
> Received: by ininx (4.0/SMI-4.0)
> 	id AA05474; Sat, 27 Aug 94 20:42:04 PDT
> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 94 20:42:04 PDT
> From: jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)
> To: perobich@ingr.com
> Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Re: Are RSA licenses fungible?
> Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
> Content-Type: text
> Content-Length: 2530
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[snip]


> 
> JEK:
> Is this true even if the person is a registered buyer of 2.7?
> 
> Public availability of a program's source code is a powerful means to be
> sure that it is correct.  How can one gain such assurance for PGP 2.7?
> 
> How could confidence in the correctness of a secret program, even by its
> author, ever match that of a program open to public scrutiny by any
> interested person?
> 
> Uhlhorn:
> ViaCrypt has exactly the same position if a person were to
> make 2.6ui look like ViaCrypt PGP V2.7 regardless of whether or
> not they are a registered user of ViaCrypt PGP V2.7.  It is plain
> dishonest and illegal!
> 
> [End of Uhlhorn dialogue]
> 
> Granted, the issue here is different from yours, but it does give an
> idea of how ViaCrypt might react to an attempt to use their license to
> legitimize your use of another PGP.  Hope this helps.
> 
> 	John E. Kreznar		| Relations among people to be by
> 	jkreznar@ininx.com	| mutual consent, or not at all.
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.3a
> 
> iQCVAgUBLmAGZ8Dhz44ugybJAQGSKAQAjlOFHarkVhF7Cjcy3xX3v7A4XyAH5B7H
> C61efV7poiJXcYCV8H6t2w6RGrk1ux/ynwoseVOjTdDraK5crqxxITCplLqY13Vv
> rzaY0BFOWOLBIgty9Gjh4Oz4v89lRKxn2MhsflrS/TxMBZSeaYec7K4ufDZwCvWN
> JQ94CgrJM/g=
> =1O6L
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

why don't you just buy an RSA toolkit licence and patch it inro whatever
you want, just don't redestribute code... 

-Rick