[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Are RSA licenses fungible?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Are RSA licenses fungible?
From: [email protected] (John E. Kreznar)
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 94 12:48:07 PDT
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: "Rick H. Wesson"'s message of Sat, 27 Aug 1994 22:34:58 -0700 <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

"Rick H. Wesson" <[email protected]> writes

> why don't you just buy an RSA toolkit licence and patch it inro whatever
> you want, just don't redestribute code...

The obstacle there has been that this is for a person who refuses on
principle to affirm that he is a national person of any nation.  I think
that such a person could not obtain an RSA toolkit license.  Right?

The interest in the ViaCrypt option arose on the hope that their
national requirements (merely being ``in the US'') might be satisfied,
even if those for MIT's PGP 2.6 (affirmation that one is a US citizen or
national) could not be.

	John E. Kreznar		| Relations among people to be by
	[email protected]	| mutual consent, or not at all.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLmDpF8Dhz44ugybJAQEtJQP/VsvgQ2AjvwLB6IDETveF49Ll2MPjtqQq
33/eWlWcqLxYKwDE3GAM/2ug4yAQtLlRg6IciNnzj7nS/4dZgeHxEB+bmMt3kTra
JvTKLiJcEWAS1Y50mE5Dqnv6eTLlEy9TUcViTPkOWtWhZHcKi/GyuwPxvW4ZU17d
3aAHXaFi39M=
=MU/N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: Are RSA licenses fungible?
  - From: "Rick H. Wesson" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Making crypto use widespread
Next by Date: Re: PGP fanatacism
Prev by thread: Re: Are RSA licenses fungible?
Next by thread: Re: Are RSA licenses fungible?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread