Re: A possible solution

[Aron Freed <s009amf@discover.wright.edu>]

On Sun, 27 Nov 1994, Mike McNally wrote:

> So why pick specifically on cryptography?  Why not increase penalties
> for criminals who in their crimes are found to have used:
> 
> *	computers;
> *	pagers;
> *	cellular phones;
> *	Casio watches with multiple alarms;
> *	Cars with power windows;
> *	Velcro-fastening tennis shoes;
> *	Gore-Tex jackets;
> *	Ibuprofen pain relievers;
> *	Fat-free ice cream;

Why don't we stick to the topic? Do you have an intelligent reply or are 
you going to shoot your mouth off? Or Maybe you can share something 
better with us, all knowing and wise one.

Aaron