[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Latency Costs of Anonymity
On Sat, 7 Jan 1995, Timothy C. May wrote:
> The good news is that many of the messages that people want
> anonymity for are *text* files, e.g., offers of services,
> controversial data or opinions, etc.
> There's a kind of tradeoff in size and urgency. To wit, it is seldom
> "urgent" that a 1 MB or 100 MB or whatever file get through. (Sorry I
> can't draw my favorite little diagram here showing the space of
> messages, with "urgency" and "size" as the axes.)
The points Tim makes here are quite good. However, I'm more concerned
with a slightly longer time scale, when people focus less on FILES,
but more on CONVERSATIONS and INTERACTIONS. It is then that latency
becomes more problematic.
Can anyone give me an estimate of when truly anonymous video conferencing
will become possible? This is not just to help me make the point, but
I'm really wondering.