[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
From: [email protected] (Eric Hughes)
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 1995 12:33:13 -0800
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> ([email protected])
Sender: [email protected]

   From: [email protected] (Timothy C. May)

   Unlike the
   Digital Telephony Bill, which was on greased skids, [...]

As far as I have been able to puzzle out, the source of this claim
were the same parties that wanted to work a "compromise".  I have
never really trusted its veracity.

There was lobbying by the FBI, to be sure, but was there not also
lobbying for previous such bills (including S.266)?

Eric

References:
- Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
  - From: [email protected] (Timothy C. May)

Prev by Date: Re: Remailer Encryption Module
Next by Date: LESM - Link Encrypted Session Manager
Prev by thread: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
Next by thread: Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread