Cypherpunks Date Index for 1995 02
Re: PFF's Magna Carta and the new netserfs
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long)
- From: dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)
Re: CD-ROM [brief addition]
- From: Dave Horsfall <dave@esi.COM.AU>
Scientology Petition v2.1
- From: Homer Wilson Smith <homer@math.cornell.edu>
ESM
- From: Mark Rogaski <rogaski@phobos.lib.iup.edu>
Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software
- From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Re: The security characteristics of crypto modules with secrets
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Minnesota Cypherpunks Get Together and Bull Session
- From: skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
Re: CD-ROM [brief addition]
- From: danisch@ira.uka.de (Hadmut Danisch)
Surety (authentication)
- From: hkhenson@cup.portal.com
A proposal....
- From: Homer Wilson Smith <homer@math.cornell.edu>
Re: CD-ROM [brief addition]
- From: Alex de Joode <usura@replay.com>
PGP Question
- From: danisch@ira.uka.de (Hadmut Danisch)
Re: CD-ROM [brief addition]
- From: danisch@ira.uka.de (Hadmut Danisch)
Re: VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?...
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long)
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: The security characteristics of crypto modules with secrets
- From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
your membership renewal letter
- From: ssteele@eff.org (Shari Steele)
Mystery files in the incoming/ directory
- From: Eric Hughes <hughes@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
Re: The security characteristics of crypto modules with secrets
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: "bad" government
- From: alt@iquest.net (Al Thompson)
Re: VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?...
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
What's with anon.penet.fi??
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Fundamental Question?
- From: Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>
Re: The security characteristics of crypto modules withsecrets
- From: A5113643667@attpls.net (Tom Jones)
Re: Fundamental Question?
- From: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
Re: Fundamental Question?
- From: Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Clipper Revived?
- From: jltocher@CCGATE.HAC.COM
Re: Fundamental Question?
- From: cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)
Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software
- From: norm@netcom.com (Norman Hardy)
Re: ESP Unix encrypted session protocol software
- From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
FMP
- From: Todd Masco <cactus@hks.net>
Re: Fundamental Question?
- From: kevin@elvis.wicat.com
Re: Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
- From: kevin@elvis.wicat.com
Re: Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
- From: kevin@elvis.wicat.com
Re: Fundamental Question?
- From: cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)
Re: PGP Question
- From: Derek Atkins <warlord@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
Lucky primes & omlets on my face...
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Ending the Crusade
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Thanks for not flaming !??!?
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Re: Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
- From: kevin@elvis.wicat.com
Re: Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
- From: cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)
Re: Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
- From: kevin@elvis.wicat.com
NYC area C'Punks meet 2/11/95
- From: mjwohler@netcom.com (Marc Wohler)
Re: Lucky primes & omlets on my face...
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Frothing remailers, the advertising and pinging problems
- From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
Re: Ending the Crusade
- From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Re: Fundamental Question?
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Clipper Revived?
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Fundamental Question?
- From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
computer underground digest stuff
- From: an158409@anon.penet.fi (beacher)
Frothing remailers and trust
- From: Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Remailer encryption module
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: Remailer encryption module
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
How much entropy in a key press?
- From: Nobody@eniac.ac.siue.edu (Anonymous)
Re: Remailer encryption module
- From: Allan Bailey <allan@elvis.tamu.edu>
Video encryption & QTC
- From: paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)
Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: How much entropy in a key press?
- From: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
Re: Remailer encryption module
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Adding padding to PGP files
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: Remailer encryption module
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: Frothing remailers, the advertising and pinging problems
- From: xpat%vm1.spcs.uma.thurman.edu@vm1.spcs.umn.edu
Re: Remailer encryption module
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: Fundamental Question?
- From: Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>
info
- From: Luis Agustin Perez <lperez@oswego.Oswego.EDU>
MX'ing and jpunix.com
- From: "John A. Perry" <perry@jpunix.com>
Re: null
- From: Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Remailer Unreliability
- From: nobody@myriad.pc.cc.cmu.edu (Anonymous)
Re: Remailer encryption module
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
- From: "Gary Jeffers" <CCGARY@MIZZOU1.missouri.edu>
Remailing in safe-tcl
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: "bad" government
- From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Re: Remailer encryption module
- From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
- From: SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
The FNORDWALL CHIP.
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: How much entropy in a key press?
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Remailer Unreliability
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Remailer Unreliability
- From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
1995-02-02 President Names Members to Intelligence Commission (fwd)
- From: Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>
Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
- From: daleh@ix.netcom.com (Dale Harrison (AEGIS))
Re: Adding padding to PGP files
- From: Nobody@eniac.ac.siue.edu (Anonymous)
Re: Remailer Unreliability
- From: jordyn@alinc.com (Jordyn A Buchanan)
Re: Adding padding to PGP files
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: Remailer Unreliability
- From: jordyn@alinc.com (Jordyn A Buchanan)
A simple idea
- From: Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
- From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Re: Adding padding to PGP files
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
- From: nobody@tower.techwood.org (Anonymous)
Re: Remailing in safe-tcl
- From: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
Re: Remailer Unreliability
- From: nobody@myriad.pc.cc.cmu.edu (Anonymous)
No Subject
- From: jltocher@CCGATE.HAC.COM
to hfinney
- From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Re: THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS
- From: peb@netcom.com (Paul E. Baclace)
Tribes, cyberspace and the communication society
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Compromising the first remailer
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Re: 1995-02-02 President Names Members to Intelligence Commissi
- From: "Brett Turcotte" <turcotte@io.com>
Re: THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS
- From: Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
Re: to hfinney
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
- From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Mugshot Identification Database announcement
- From: Technoshaman Tom <tedwards@wam.umd.edu>
re to hfinney
- From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Re: Compromising the first remailer
- From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
Re: Remailer encryption module
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
NYT on Jihad
- From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Re: re to hfinney
- From: Joe Turner <turner@telecheck.com>
Re: Lucky primes & omlets on my face...
- From: chen@intuit.com (Mark Chen)
Re: The FIREWALL CHIP. U're phone always offhook?
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Remailer Unreliability
- From: Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Re: MX'ing and jpunix.com
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: VoicePGP cracked in 10 minutes?...
- From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Re: Is the remailer crisis over?
- From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
AIR Mosaic Feedback Mail
Re: re to hfinney
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: commercial authecation
- From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Wired Institutes PGP Usage For Subscriptions....
- From: werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)
Re: commercial authecation
- From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
IMPORTANT: BUG IN 68K IDEA ASSEMBLER DISTRIBUTED IN SECURE EDIT
- From: tjb@acpub.duke.edu (Tom Bryce)
FIXED SEC. EDIT, SEC. EDIT SOURCE, UPGRADE PATCH
- From: tjb@acpub.duke.edu (Tom Bryce)
<none specified>
- From: Anonymous <nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Re: Wired Institutes PGP Usage For Subscriptions....
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Forward: Teleco/Cabe REg. & Free speech
- From: "Harry S. Hawk" <habs@panix.com>
NYC CPUNKS MEET NEXT SAT
- From: mjwohler@netcom.com (Marc Wohler)
Re: <none specified>
- From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
signature validation on secure edit messages
- From: tjb@acpub.duke.edu (Tom Bryce)
There is another NetCash
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
PGP padding scripts (again)
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: PGP padding scripts (again)
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Re: re to hfinney
- From: roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
Re: There is another NetCash
- From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
finney's perl scripts
- From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Re: How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long)
- From: sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)
Re: Forward: Teleco/Cabe REg. & Free speech
- From: mikepb@freke.lerctr.org (Michael P. Brininstool)
Vinge on PKE ?
- From: lwp@garnet.msen.com (Lou Poppler)
Re: Vinge on PKE ?
- From: Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
Re: Vinge on PKE ?
- From: Lou Poppler <lwp@garnet.msen.com>
Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
- From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Re: Forward: Teleco/Cabe REg. & Free speech
- From: "Harry S. Hawk" <habs@panix.com>
Vinge on PKE ?
- From: david.lloyd-jones@canrem.com (David Lloyd-Jones)
Re: Vinge on PKE ?
- From: erc@s116.slcslip.indirect.com (Ed Carp [khijol Sysadmin])
Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
- From: lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)
Mixmaster client release
- From: lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)
The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
- From: strick at The Yak <strick@yak.net>
NYT on Tera and UUNet
- From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Here we go again...
- From: Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@aeinet.com>
No Subject
- From: Syed Yusuf <yusuf921@uidaho.edu>
BROKEN REMAILERS
- From: nobody@tower.techwood.org (Anonymous)
BROKEN REMAILERS
- From: Nobody@eniac.ac.siue.edu (Anonymous)
Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
- From: sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)
Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
- From: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
- From: sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)
Zimmermann charges dropped?
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Re: How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long)
- From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
- From: Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Re: Zimmermann charges dropped?
- From: Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
RE: VINGE ON PKE ?
- From: david.lloyd-jones@canrem.com (David Lloyd-Jones)
Re: BROKEN REMAILERS
- From: Alex de Joode <usura@replay.com>
Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
- From: Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Re: BROKEN REMAILERS
- From: lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)
Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
- From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
"encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: strick at The Yak <strick@yak.net>
Re: signature validation on secure edit messages
- From: joelm@eskimo.com (Joel McNamara)
Judge not...
- From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: signature validation on secure edit messages
- From: dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)
Re: Judge not...
- From: Dave Horsfall <dave@esi.COM.AU>
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: lrh@PrimeNet.Com (Dr. Lyman Hazelton)
Excerpts of signed messages
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
dna ink
- From: Dan Harmon <harmon@tenet.edu>
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Zimmermann charges NOT dropped
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Re: Here we go again...
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Re: Remailer encryption module
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: finney's perl scripts
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
New directions in anonymity (needed)
- From: Mike Ingle <MIKEINGLE@delphi.com>
Re: Judge not...
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
re finney's perl scripts
- From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Creating commercial acceptability for remailers?
- From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Re: Zimmermann charges NOT dropped
- From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Mixmaster supports PGP
- From: lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)
Re: New directions in anonymity (needed)
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
- From: strick -- henry strickland <strick@versant.com>
Re: New directions in anonymity (needed)
- From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Remailer msgs ideath -> rebma don't work.
- From: Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Re: Legal implications of one-of-a-group guilt
- From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Re: Legal implications of one-of-a-group guilt
- From: an448@freenet.carleton.ca (Yves Bellefeuille)
Re: Excerpts of signed messages
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: dna ink
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Cooperation
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Re: Cooperation
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Change to the congressional contact list
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
List of reliable remailers
- From: Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Re: Vinge on PKE ? (really idiot savants)
- From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@stout.atd.ucar.edu>
Camden New Jersey
- From: an158409@anon.penet.fi (beacher)
Re: Camden New Jersey
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
CFP'95 Program/Registration Information (fwd)
- From: Michael Froomkin <MFROOMKI@umiami.ir.miami.edu>
Re: Cooperation
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: dna ink
- From: Mark Rogaski <rogaski@phobos.lib.iup.edu>
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: "Trool the Red Adept" <cdbunch@bansai.ucs.uoknor.edu>
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Re: Cooperation
- From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
MD5 coding
- From: philip@cs.brandeis.edu (Philip Trauring)
To Bundle Or Not To Bundle?
- From: jltocher@CCGATE.HAC.COM
Re: MD5 coding
- From: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
Re: Cooperation
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: MD5 coding
- From: philip@cs.brandeis.edu (Philip Trauring)
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
RE: Firewall chips
- From: Brian D Williams <talon57@well.sf.ca.us>
Re: Cooperation
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: dna ink
- From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Re: Cooperation
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: dna ink
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Re: Cooperation
- From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@aeinet.com>
RE: DNA ink
- From: Brian D Williams <talon57@well.sf.ca.us>
preliminary cypherpunks announcement
- From: Katy Kislitzin <ktk@anemone.corp.sgi.com>
a simple explanation of DC-Net
- From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
Re: alt.religion.your.operating.system.sucks
- From: Christopher E Stefan <flatline@u.washington.edu>
Remailer RFC
- From: Michael Handler <grendel@netaxs.com>
Re: dna ink
- From: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
(dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers
- From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>
Re: a simple explanation of DC-Net
- From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Re: dna ink
- From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
Re: New directions in anonymity (needed)
- From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Re: dna ink
- From: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
Re: (dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Automatic Echo of Test Posting
- From: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (Usenet Administration)
Re: lwall
- From: MathWorks Autoresponder <usenet@mathworks.com>
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Re: dna ink
- From: sdw@lig.net (Stephen D. Williams)
Re: New directions in anonymity (needed)
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: a simple explanation of DC-Net
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Re: lwall
- From: Xpat Autoresponder <autoreply@xpat.postech.ac.kr>
Re: MD5 coding
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
The Rise of "Worse is Better"...
- From: stig@hackvan.com (Stig)
Corporate Fascism, Rand, Greens, Oh My!
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Re: Is the remailer crisis over?
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Re: The Rise of "Worse is Better"...
- From: stig@hackvan.com (Stig)
Remailer Scripting Languages
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Re: dna ink
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: lwall
- From: Usenet Autoresponder <usenet@netnet2.netnet.net>
Re: Cooperation
- From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
RE: Re: lwall
- From: rparratt@london.micrognosis.com (Richard Parratt)
Source code for Applied Cryptography
- From: lce@wwa.com (Larry E)
RE: Source code for Applied Cryptography
- From: Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@aeinet.com>
URGENT - What S.314 Would Do
- From: slowdog@wookie.net (slowdog)
Re: The Rise of "Worse is Better"...
- From: jason cooper <jcooper@acs.ucalgary.ca>
MIME based remailing commands
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: Is the remailer crisis over?
- From: nobody@tower.techwood.org (Anonymous)
Re: (dis)advantages of DC-Net vs remailers
- From: Andrew Lowenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Re: dna ink
- From: Keith Henson <keith@filoli.com>
CIAC Bulletin F-10: HP-UX Remote Watch
- From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
testing the waters re: new crypto FTP site
- From: tjb@acpub.duke.edu (Tom Bryce)
Re: preliminary cypherpunks announcement
- From: Katy Kislitzin <ktk@anemone.corp.sgi.com>
Re: CIAC Bulletin F-10: HP-UX Remote Watch
- From: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
Re: Corporate Fascism, Rand, Greens, Oh My!
- From: frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
Re: Is the remailer crisis over?
- From: Mats Bergstrom <asgaard@sos.sll.se>
Re: dna ink
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
dna ink
- From: Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com>
Re: dna ink
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Seals and Sealing Waxes
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
CFP, Cypherpunks, and Crypto
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Child Porno
- From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Re: CFP, Cypherpunks, and Crypto
- From: Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
ssl-talk@netscape.com
- From: "Kipp E.B. Hickman" <kipp@warp.mcom.com>
Zimmermann
- From: "Philip L. Dubois" <dubois@csn.org>
Re: Zimmermann
- From: Jack Repenning <jackr@dblues.engr.sgi.com>
noiz-0.5: simple noise-emitting package
- From: strick@techwood.org
EPIC Alert 2.02
- From: Dave_Banisar.OFFICE@epic.org
NYC CPUNKS MEET
- From: mjwohler@netcom.com (Marc Wohler)
Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Re: Seals and Sealing Waxes
- From: chen@intuit.com (Mark Chen)
RE: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@aeinet.com>
a new way to do anonymity
- From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
Re: Zimmermann
- From: Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
Re: noiz-0.5: simple noise-emitting package
- From: Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
forward; e-cash
- From: "Harry S. Hawk" <habs@panix.com>
!NYC Cypherpunks meeting 2/11/95!
- From: Arsen Ray Arachelian <rarachel@photon.poly.edu>
RE: a new way to do anonymity
- From: Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@aeinet.com>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
Re: "encrypt tcp connections" hacks
- From: Chris Claborne <Chris.Claborne@SanDiego.ATTGIS.COM>
Re: a new way to do anonymity
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
RE: a new way to do anonymity
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Fwd: Seals and Sealing Waxes
- From: Alan Pugh <0003701548@mcimail.com>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
S.314, the "Pi Bill"
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
USPO & Digital Postage/E-Cash Project
- From: daleh@ix.netcom.com (Dale Harrison (AEGIS))
Re: S.314, the "Pi Bill"
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
RE: a new way to do anonymity
- From: Johnathan Corgan <jcorgan@aeinet.com>
Full text of S. 314
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
noiz ... and more SKRONK
- From: strick@techwood.org
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Anthony Ortenzi <ortenzi@interactive.net>
Re: URGENT - What S.314 Would Do
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Re: Full text of S. 314
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Congressional Phone Numbers
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@c2.org>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
Exon in WSJ
- From: frissell@panix.com (Duncan Frissell)
RE: a new way to do anonymity
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
WSJ Article on Sen. Exon's Legislation
- From: daleh@ix.netcom.com (Dale Harrison (AEGIS))
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: "Brett Turcotte" <turcotte@io.com>
Re: WSJ Article on Sen. Exon's Legislation
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: USPO & Digital Postage/E-Cash Project
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
MBONE access needed
- From: perry@imsi.com (Perry E. Metzger)
Re: lwall
- From: NIEHS Autoresponder <usenet@jeeves.niehs.nih.gov>
Email Add's of Senators?
- From: Jaeson.M.Engle@josaiah.sewanee.edu (Rhys Kyraden)
Re: USPO & Digital Postage/E-Cash Project
- From: haeberli@apple.com (Martin Haeberli)
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Seals and Sealing Waxes
- From: System Operator <system@decode.com>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in (Rishab Aiyer Ghosh)
Re: skronk
- From: strick@techwood.org
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: strick@techwood.org
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
Re: Full text of S. 314
- From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
Re: skronk
- From: "Kipp E.B. Hickman" <kipp@warp.mcom.com>
Re: skronk
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: skronk
- From: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Re: skronk
- From: cactus@seabsd.hks.net (Todd Masco)
Four Horsemen
- From: kkirksey@world.std.com (Ken Kirksey)
Jefferson Wheel Cypher
- From: kkirksey@world.std.com (Ken Kirksey)
Re: Seals and Sealing Waxes
- From: kkirksey@world.std.com (Ken Kirksey)
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Re: skronk
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Judges-L FAQ
- From: "Craig A. Johnston" <caj@tower.techwood.org>
Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: skronk
- From: "Kipp E.B. Hickman" <kipp@warp.mcom.com>
Wiretaps & terrorism
- From: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
Re: Judges-L FAQ
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: lwall
- From: EFN Autoresponder <usenet@news.efn.org>
Re: Four Horsemen
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Re: Judges-L FAQ
- From: Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>
To clear this up.
- From: "Craig A. Johnston" <caj@tower.techwood.org>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
Re: Judges-L FAQ
- From: Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
Re: Jefferson Wheel Cypher
- From: Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
RE: a new way to do anonymity
- From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: xpat@vm1.spcs.umn.edu
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: a new way to do anonymity
- From: Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
Hastur CT status
- From: A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies <cactus@hks.net>
The drumbeat against anonymity continues....
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
Re: Judges-L FAQ
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Meeting Anncouncement for Sat. Feb. 11 1995 SF Bay Area Meeting
- From: hugh@ecotone.toad.com (Hugh Daniel)
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: dmandl@panix.com (David Mandl)
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Re: Judges-L FAQ
- From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
Re: The Rise of "Worse is Better"...
- From: Don Clysdale <clysdale@dragon.achilles.net>
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: droelke@spirit.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
Vernor Vinge info...
Re: Judges-L FAQ
- From: Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
S314 and potential hell-raising
- From: silly@beat.ugcs.caltech.edu ((me))
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Da Judge-L FAQ -- We are not Amused
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
- From: Jaeson.M.Engle@josaiah.sewanee.edu (Rhys Kyraden)
Re: Hastur CT status
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: skronk
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: skronk
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
S. 314 and existing situation
- From: "Richard F. Dutcher" <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
Re: Da Judge-L FAQ -- We are not Amused
- From: Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
Re: The drumbeat against anonymity continues....
- From: ethridge@netcom.com (Allen B. Ethridge)
Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
- From: skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
- From: skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
- From: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
Coming to a newsserver near you alt.defeat.s314
- From: nobody@tower.techwood.org (Name Withheld)
Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
- From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
- From: Jaeson.M.Engle@josaiah.sewanee.edu (Rhys Kyraden)
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
- From: joshua geller <alkahest!joshua@dee.retix.com>
Re: Da Judge-L FAQ -- We are not Amused
- From: joshua geller <alkahest!joshua@dee.retix.com>
NSO Challenge 95 Nr. 1
- From: Network Security Observations <NSO@delphi.com>
Re: The drumbeat against anonymity continues....
- From: rparratt@london.micrognosis.com (Richard Parratt)
Crusade's End
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Frothing remailers - an immodest proposal
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
re: Remailer Encryption Module
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
IQ & such
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Lucky primes--third time's the charm?
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Threat models. [was: Why encrypt intra-remailernet]
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Mixmaster + T1
- From: Nathan Zook <nzook@bga.com>
Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
- From: erc@s116.slcslip.indirect.com (Ed Carp [khijol Sysadmin])
Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
- From: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
- From: erc@s116.slcslip.indirect.com (Ed Carp [khijol Sysadmin])
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
- From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
- From: Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
- From: pdlamb@iquest.com (Patrick Lamb)
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
- From: Philippe Nave <pdn@drmail.dr.att.com>
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
Re: Cooperation
- From: storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: joshua geller <joshua@dee.retix.com>
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: Greg Morgan <mac5tgm@hibbs.vcu.edu>
Re: Best encryption device driver for MS-DOS?
- From: Greg Morgan <mac5tgm@hibbs.vcu.edu>
Re: Lucky primes--third time's the charm?
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Senate Version of HR666 (fwd)
- From: Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
My pgp emacs code in ftp://ftp.markv.com/pub/jpp/pgpelisp/*
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Re: S. 314 and existing situation
- From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
NYT on HR666
- From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Re: skronk
- From: kipp@warp.mcom.com (Kipp E.B. Hickman)
Re: skronk
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
Re: S. 314 and existing situation
- From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
PEM
- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Re: Remailer Encryption Module
- From: cactus@seabsd.hks.net (A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies)
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: eric@remailer.net (Eric Hughes)
LESM - Link Encrypted Session Manager
- From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Wed 15 Feb, 730pm: BayFF's first monthly Bay Area EFF meeting
S.314 on Web
- From: Richard Martin ( frodo ) <g4frodo@cdf.toronto.edu>
Key management in Hastur
- From: A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies <cactus@hks.net>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
Re: Wed 15 Feb, 730pm: BayFF's first monthly Bay Area EFF meeting
- From: Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
No Subject
- From: jltocher@CCGATE.HAC.COM
So, what's it all about?
- From: "Eric Merth" <emerth@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>
RE: a new way to do anonymity
- From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
Re: So, what's it all about?
- From: joshua geller <joshua@dee.retix.com>
RE: a new way to do anonymity
- From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
Re: So, what's it all about?
- From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Re: web pages sucking secrets from your hard drive
- From: Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
LESM - Link Encrypted Session Manager (3rd try)
- From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
RE: a new way to do anonymity
- From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
Re: LESM - Link Encrypted Session Manager (3rd try)
- From: cactus@seabsd.hks.net (A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies)
Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
- From: <dshayer@netcom.com> (David Shayer)
Re: Da Judge-L FAQ -- We are not Amused
- From: peterb@telerama.lm.com (Peter Berger)
The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)
- From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: lcottrell@popmail.ucsd.edu (Lance Cottrell)
(fwd) OREGON HOUSE BILL 2319 - Outlaw Anoniminty??
- From: skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
Labour and capital in a post-industrial economy
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in (Rishab Aiyer Ghosh)
Re: Selection key crypto protocol trial balloon
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
stupid legislation in Oregon
- From: Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Delphi and Encryption??
- From: "Harry S. Hawk" <habs@panix.com>
Re: The question is moot:
- From: wfgodot@iquest.com (Michael Pierson)
Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)
- From: Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
Not moot? [Was Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)]
- From: Michael Froomkin <MFROOMKI@umiami.ir.miami.edu>
Indian Supreme Court ends state control of the airwaves
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
GSM and cellular crypto
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
a draft petition against S.314
- From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
HR830 - Anyone tracking this?
- From: mgh5868@ultb.isc.rit.edu (M.G. Hunsberger)
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Global Filesystem Guild
- From: lethin@ai.mit.edu (Rich Lethin)
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
PSI Gulps Pipeline
- From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Re: URGENT - What S.314 Would Do
- From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
http://www.vocaltec.com/gti.html
- From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Bernstein! Where are YOU!
- From: Peter F Cassidy <pcassidy@world.std.com>
Re: Bernstein! Where are YOU!
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: Global Filesystem Guild
- From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
why pgp sucks
- From: Eric Hollander <hh@xcf.Berkeley.EDU>
Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)
- From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
Re: HR830 - Anyone tracking this?
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Re: Bernstein! Where are YOU!
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: West (was:HR830 - Anyone tracking this?)
- From: xpat@vm1.spcs.umn.edu
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Re: So, what's it all about?
- From: abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Greg Morgan <mac5tgm@hibbs.vcu.edu>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Re: Coming to a newsserver near you alt.defeat.s314
- From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
law vs technology
- From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: Bernstein
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Re: The drumbeat against anonymity (Cellphone security?)
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Laws, Feds, & the Internet
- From: "Richard F. Dutcher" <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Re: law vs technology
- From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Re: S. 314 and existing situation
- From: storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)
Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
- From: storm@marlin.ssnet.com (Don Melvin)
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Erich von Hollander <erich@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>
Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
- From: Dave Harvey <warrior@infinet.com>
why pgp sucks
- From: Greg Broiles <greg@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: So, what's it all about?
- From: Network Security Observations <NSO@delphi.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
- From: "Richard F. Dutcher" <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Re: Bernstein
- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Re: Bernstein
- From: Peter F Cassidy <pcassidy@world.std.com>
Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
- From: dls@mcs.com (David Sallach)
new book pre announcement
- From: Network Security Observations <NSO@delphi.com>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: alt@iquest.net (Al Thompson)
Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
- From: "Richard F. Dutcher" <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
Re: West (just a minute)
- From: craig@passport.ca (Craig Hubley)
Re: Bernstein
- From: Alan Barrett <barrett@daisy.ee.und.ac.za>
automatic reply to test posting (lwall)
- From: news@visionware.co.uk (Visionware News)
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Privacy vs. Ubiquitous Video: NetCam; Wearable WebCam, etc
- From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
NYT on Cybertheft and Sex Writer
- From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Four Horsemen of the Infopocalypse?
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Not necessarily crypt
- From: lee.noon@mgmtsys.com (Lee Noon)
Forwarded mail....
- From: Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
Re: why pgp sucks
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: S314 and potential hell-raising
- From: Dave Banisar <tc@phantom.com>
Re: Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
- From: jtender@telerama.lm.com (John Tender)
Re: Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
- From: jtender@telerama.lm.com (John Tender)
Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
- From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Re: NYT on Cybertheft and Sex Writer
- From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
"Being Digital" spinde
- From: "Rick H. Wesson" <wessorh@ar.com>
Does PGP scale well?
- From: A5113643667@attpls.net (Tom Jones)
Re: Does PGP scale well?
- From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
Re: Does PGP scale well?
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Secure Drive ver. & loc. ?
- From: "Gary Jeffers" <CCGARY@MIZZOU1.missouri.edu>
Feb 15th Meeting About PGP
- From: Andre Bacard <abacard@well.sf.ca.us>
TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (2/2)
- From: nobody@nately.UCSD.EDU (Anonymous)
TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (1/2)
- From: nobody@nately.UCSD.EDU (Anonymous)
Re: Does PGP scale well?
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: law vs technology
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Does PGP scale well?
- From: mccoy@io.com (Jim McCoy)
Re: Does PGP scale well?
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Fwd: Re: West (just a minute)
- From: Alan Pugh <0003701548@mcimail.com>
Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
- From: "Richard F. Dutcher" <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
the problem that destroyed PGP
Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Q: ref. for DNA used to solve math. network prob. (fwd)
- From: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
- From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
- From: "W. Kinney" <kinney@bogart.Colorado.EDU>
Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
- From: "W. Kinney" <kinney@bogart.Colorado.EDU>
Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Re: The question is moot: (Was: Not crypto, but scary.)
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Privacy digest an all
- From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Design my protocol
- From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Re: the problem that destroyed PGP
- From: "W. Kinney" <kinney@bogart.Colorado.EDU>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Re: Q: ref. for DNA used to solve math. network prob. (fwd)
- From: cjl <cjl@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>
Involve Telcos in activism?
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Clinton's No Warrant decree, and insulting dogs
- From: rishab@dxm.ernet.in
Clinton's No Warrant decree, and insulting dogs
- From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
- From: schneier@chinet.chinet.com
Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
- From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
- From: Zachary <zachary@pentagon.io.com>
Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
- From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
- From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
- From: jrochkin@cs.oberlin.edu (Jonathan Rochkind)
Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
- From: doug@OpenMind.com (Doug Cutrell)
Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
- From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
bill alert...
- From: Lile Elam <lile@art.net>
Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
- From: Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>
Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
- From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
standards...
- From: M00012@kanga.stcloud.msus.edu
Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
- From: "Richard F. Dutcher" <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
Re: Our Ignorance of Govt. Capabilities
- From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
- From: roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
- From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
Re: Our Ignorance....
- From: M00012@kanga.stcloud.msus.edu
Re: Q: ref. for DNA used to solve math. network prob. (fwd)
- From: cactus@seabsd.hks.net (A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies)
Re: Does Anyone Even Read This Stuff ? (was Re: The NSA)
- From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Re: standards...
- From: cactus@seabsd.hks.net (A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies)
Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
- From: aegis@netcom.com (Dale Harrison)
Automatic reply to your test message (lwall)
- From: News auto-reply daemon <news@lucy.ee.und.ac.za>
you are invited...
- From: Lile Elam <lile@art.net>
Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@nsb.fv.com>
Re: bill alert...
- From: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
Archives?
- From: Jason Burrell <jburrell@crl.com>
Re: standards...
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
- From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
List of reliable remailers
- From: Raph Levien <raph@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Re: UMich student arrested for rape story
- From: syshtg@gsusgi2.gsu.edu (Tom Gillman)
Re: bill alert...
- From: roy@cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: bill alert...
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?
- From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
RE: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?
- From: Blanc Weber <blancw@microsoft.com>
Fun with numbers: Payment Switches
- From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
WSJ article on Internet Telephony
- From: usviszpz@ibmmail.com
CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
Re: standards...
- From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?
- From: "Wei Dai" <weidai@eskimo.com>
perry@imsi.comRe: Does PGP scale well?
- From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Re: TEMPEST Paper by Former Civilian (1/2)
- From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
- From: "Dave Banisar" <banisar@epic.org>
Re: bill alert...
- From: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
Re: The NSA (Was Re: Factoring - State of the Art and Predictions )
- From: anonymous-remailer@xs4all.nl (Name withheld on request)
Archives
- From: cactus@seabsd.hks.net (A Loose Affiliation of Millionaires and Billionaires and Babies)
Re: bill alert...
- From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?
- From: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
CNN (fwd) Communications (In)Decency Act?
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: perry@imsi.comRe: Does PGP scale well?
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
- From: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
No Subject
- From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Re: lwall
- From: (Bull Worldwide AutoResponder) <UseNet@news.bull.com>
EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
- From: Connie Sadler <SADLER_C@HOSP.STANFORD.EDU>
Ignore Test
- From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
- From: Samuel Kaplin <skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com>
What *is* the power of the FIPS
- From: Peter F Cassidy <pcassidy@world.std.com>
Excel 5 Encryption
- From: bwern@jax.jaxnet.com (Ben Wern)
Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
- From: Jack Repenning <jackr@dblues.engr.sgi.com>
Re: What *is* the power of the FIPS
- From: rah@shipwright.com (Robert Hettinga)
Re: your mail
- From: "W. Kinney" <kinney@bogart.Colorado.EDU>
Re: Excel 5 Encryption
- From: Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
- From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Re: What *is* the power of the FIPS
- From: Jim Gillogly <jim@acm.org>
Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
- From: Jim Gillogly <jim@rand.org>
French Mystics, Martin Gardner, and Transcendentality
- From: mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
- From: Jim Gillogly <jim@rand.org>
Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
- From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>
Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
- From: Greg Morgan <mac5tgm@hibbs.vcu.edu>
Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
- From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
Re: MIME based remailing commands
- From: Rick Busdiecker <rfb@lehman.com>
Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
- From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
- From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Re: What *is* the power of the FIPS
- From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
ref on crypto formalism
- From: Pierre Uszynski <pierre@shell.portal.com>
Zimmerphone, IPhone, NetPhone, Maven...
- From: Michael Sattler <msattler@jungle.com>
(Fwd) Returned mail
- From: "Richard F. Dutcher" <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
- From: slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
Re: The NSA
- From: werewolf@io.org (Mark Terka)
Distributed Key Service for PGP (was: why pgp sucks)
- From: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
The NSA (Was Re: Factorin
- From: david.lloyd-jones@canrem.com (David Lloyd-Jones)
Re: ref on crypto formalism
- From: "L. McCarthy" <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
Re: WSJ article on Internet Telephony
- From: erc@s116.slcslip.indirect.com (Ed Carp [khijol Sysadmin])
Re: CDT POLICY POST No.2 -- X9 TO DEVELOP TRIPLE-DES STANDARDS
- From: "Richard F. Dutcher" <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
Re: Is Cyberspace Rich Enough?
- From: "Richard F. Dutcher" <rfdutcher@igc.apc.org>
Re: EPIC to Debate Exon on CNN
- From: skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com (Samuel Kaplin)
Internationalism no panacea
- From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Cypher_punks standards, again.
- From: M00012@kanga.stcloud.msus.edu
Re: Laws, Feds, & the Internet
- From: abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
Re: ANNOUNCE: New Crypto Product!
- From: Peng-chiew Low <pclow@pc.jaring.my>
UNSUBCRIBE CENSORSHIP
- From: Aron Bierbaum <aronb@nishna.net>
UNSUBCRIBE CENSORSHIP
- From: Aron Bierbaum <aronb@nishna.net>
Re: Why Doesn't Wired.....
- From: jimp@wired.com (Jim Petersen)
No Subject
- From: david@arch.ping.dk (David Stodolsky)
No Subject
Mail converted by MHonArc
2.4.3