[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MIME based remailing commands

To: Rick Busdiecker <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: MIME based remailing commands
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 1995 16:16:33 -0500
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Feb 1995 15:57:19 EST." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


Rick Busdiecker says:
> Could one of the MIME supporters (I guess that would be `most
> everybody') explain why anything more than a To: header and an
> encrypted block is desireable for the in-the-clear message?
> 
> Specifically, why is it desireable to broadcast additional information
> about a message for which privacy is a primary concern?

No one said that it was desirable to do so, and MIME does not force
you to do so.

.pm

References:
- Re: MIME based remailing commands
  - From: Rick Busdiecker <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: MIME based remailing commands
Next by Date: Re: why pgp sucks
Prev by thread: Re: MIME based remailing commands
Next by thread: Re: MIME based remailing commands
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread