[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fundamental Question?

To: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Fundamental Question?
From: Rick Busdiecker <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 1995 23:46:54 -0500
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Feb 1995 23:00:18 EST." <[email protected]>
Organization: Lehman Brothers Inc.
Reply-To: Rick Busdiecker <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

    Date: Wed, 1 Feb 95 23:00:18 EST
    From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <[email protected]>

    Well, it's happened in the past. Doesn't mean Usenet is perfect for it,
    since nobody wants to sift through several thousand messages a day for
    messages encrypted to him/her.

It's easy to automate and you are incorrect in saying that nobody does
it.  alt.anonymous.messages was created as an implementation of an
anonymous message pool.  I wouldn't go so far as to say that it's
perfect, but it's simple and it works.  If you post a message
encrypted for my public key and include my name and/or my key id in
the subject, I'll get it.  And, no, I'm not the only one who uses it.

			Rick

References:
- Re: Fundamental Question?
  - From: Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Clipper Revived?
Next by Date: Re: Why encrypt intra-remailernet.
Prev by thread: Re: Fundamental Question?
Next by thread: Re: Fundamental Question?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread