[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)

To: Adam Shostack <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 1995 16:17:31 -0500
Cc: [email protected] (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Feb 1995 15:24:33 EST." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


Adam Shostack says:
> 	I was going to say some similar things about firewalls, but
> then decided that Strick is doing the right thing.  If the firewall
> wants to offer skronk'd services, it can respond to the UDP packet,
> and offer up services, presumably through relays.

I was going to mention something about not putting excess thought into
the fifth or sixth "encrypt tcp connections" hack I'm aware of, but...

Perry

References:
- Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
  - From: Adam Shostack <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: How the cypherpunks nearly got me fired (long)
Next by Date: Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
Prev by thread: Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
Next by thread: Re: The SKRONK protocols (version 0.6)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread