[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Remailer Unreliability

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Remailer Unreliability
From: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 1995 19:00:38 -0800
Comments: This message is NOT from the person listed in the Fromline. It is from an automated software remailing service operating atthat address.THE PORTAL SYSTEM DOES NOT CONDONE OR APPROVE OF THE CONTENTS OF THISPOSTING. Please report problem mail to <[email protected]>.
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> ([email protected])
Sender: [email protected]

> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 95 18:00 EST
> From: [email protected] (Anonymous)
> 
> What if it was possible to specify an alternate remailer?  In the case that
> a remailer went down, you could specify an alternate.  For example:

  Well, *I* think it is a good idea.  But how does remailer1 know that
remailer2 is both a remailer and down?

  Noyb

References:
- Remailer Unreliability
  - From: [email protected] (Anonymous)

Prev by Date: Re: Remailer Unreliability
Next by Date: 1995-02-02 President Names Members to Intelligence Commission (fwd)
Prev by thread: Re: Remailer Unreliability
Next by thread: Re: Remailer Unreliability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread